What does the Autumn Budget mean for the property sector?

Phew... or Too Few?

As Chancellor Rachel Reeves stood up at the despatch box and delivered the Budget in person, rather than via the clickbait social media and leaks-to-the-media that have dominated the national conversation over recent months and put a pause on any serious investment decisions by businesses, the collective sigh of relief from the housebuilding sector was almost audible. 

Not only did this feel like how politics at the highest level should be conducted; it wasn’t nearly as bad as many had predicted.

No major stamp duty land tax hikes. No serious capital gains tax changes. A ‘mansion tax’ that really isn’t a tax on mansions (albeit a new £2.5k-£7.5k prime property holding cost isn’t ideal) and the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR)’s economic forecasts, whilst hardly bullish, weren't the disaster many had anticipated. The bond markets remained calm and businesses can now plan 2026 with more certainty.

Phew.

But there was something jarring about it: if the fiscal picture wasn't as bleak as expected, why did we get so few meaningful measures to address the housing crisis?

The OBR's November 2025 Economic and Fiscal Outlook painted a picture that, whilst challenging, offered more headroom than the pre-Budget doom-mongering & leaks suggested. Growth forecasts were revised, the fiscal position stabilised, and the markets didn't revolt. The Chancellor, it seems, had more room for manoeuvre than many anticipated.

If there was more fiscal space available, why was housing policy essentially absent from this Budget?

• No Help-to-Buy 2.0
• No stimulus for Build to Rent supply
• No meaningful intervention to address the supply crisis that everyone—from the OBR to the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) to industry bodies—agrees is the fundamental problem facing the housing market
• No mechanism to effect an orderly transition to a professionalised Private Rental Sector
• No downsizer incentives to increase housing market mobility & support the senior living sector…

What makes these omissions particularly glaring is that the OBR itself flagged the consequences of inaction on housing. Buried in their report is this stark assessment:

The measures announced in this Budget reduce returns to private landlords...This successive eroding of private landlord returns will likely reduce the supply of rental property over the longer run. This risks a steady long-term rise in rents if demand outstrips supply.

Read that again. The government's own independent forecaster is warning that current policy will shrink rental supply and push up rents. And the Budget's response was silence. 

Yet both the Renters’ Rights Act and the dream of delivering 1.5m new homes by 2029 are absolutely keystones in this government’s policy ‘Edstone’.

In which case who was this Budget for? Because it doesn’t seem to contain any fiscal measures to support either of those two ambitions. 

• For renters facing a shrinking supply and rising rents? Nothing. 
• For housebuilders and BTR investors who could deliver the supply we desperately need? Nothing. 
• For first-time buyers priced out of the market? Nothing.
• For a country facing upwards of ~4m worth of functionally-obsolete housing stock?  Nothing.

As the IEA noted in its post-Budget analysis, this instead feels like a Budget designed to satisfy two very different audiences: Labour backbenchers and the bond markets.

Political optics and fiscal credibility thus seem to have taken priority over addressing structural problems in the housing market; some of them of the Government’s own making.

So yes, phew - it could have been worse. 

The property sector did avoid some of the more punitive measures that were rumoured. But when the OBR is explicitly warning about a rental supply crisis, and the Chancellor had fiscal headroom to act, doing not very much feels like a wasted opportunity.

The housing crisis won't solve itself. And if the government's own forecaster is telling us that current policy will make it worse, perhaps "not as bad as feared" won’t turn out to be quite the win we thought it was.

For further information contact Seb Verity.